Home Indemnity Company of New York and Louis E. Stultz v. J. H. Poladian and J. Harry Poladian, Jr., T/a J. H. Poladian & Son
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SOBELOFF, Chief Judge.
Divergent provisions in the Workmen’s Compensation laws of Virginia and the District of Columbia give rise to this controversy. Under the Virginia law 1 a general contractor is deemed the statutory employer of his subcontractor’s employees; he is obligated to provide compensation insurance for them and is immune from common law actions by them for negligence. In the District of Columbia, where the Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Act 2 is applicable, there is no such provision. There the general contractor is a stranger to the subcontractor’s employees, is not required…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Sykes v. Stone & Webster Engineering Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1947
- Jonathan Woodner Co. v. MatherCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954
- Doane v. E. I. Dupont De Nemours & Co. (Inc.)Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1954
- Aistrop v. Blue Diamond Coal Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1943
- Bagnel v. Springfield Sand & Tile Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1944
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Turnage v. Northern Virginia Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1964
- McCann v. Newport News Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1959
- Wilson v. FraserDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1973
- Coulter v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2003
- Shaw v. Layton Const. Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1994
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.