Bagnel v. Springfield Sand & Tile Co.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MAGRUDER, Circuit Judge.
This consolidated appeal brings up for review four judgments entered in the court below, all of them adverse to appellant Bagnel on a common question of law. The principal issue which has been argued is whether the provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Law of New York, Consol. Laws, c. 67, or the Workmen’s Compensation Act of Massachusetts, G.L. (Ter.Ed.) c. 152, § 1 et seq., should be applied in a case where appellant, a resident of New York, working under a contract of employment made in that state, was, while on temporary assignment to work in Massachusetts,…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Alaska Packers Assn. v. Industrial Accident Comm'n of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. HuntSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Pacific Employers Insurance v. Industrial Accident Comm'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Wilson v. FaullSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
- Jonathan Woodner Co. v. MatherCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954
- Davison v. Martin K. Eby Construction Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1950
- Jewtraw v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
- Johnson v. El Dorado Creosoting Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1954
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.