Legal Opinion
Jonathan Woodner Co. v. Mather
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided March 19, 1954No. 11624_1PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WASHINGTON, Circuit Judge.
Ernest Mather was employed in the District of Columbia, where he resided, by the Colonial Electric Company. He was injured while working as an electrician on an apartment construction project in Maryland. The Jonathan Woodner Company was the principal contractor on this project; Colonial Electric was a subcontractor.
Colonial Electric had workmen’s compensation insurance for Mather’s benefit under both the Maryland and the District of Columbia Compensation Acts. Woodner had workmen’s compensation insurance for Mather’s benefit under the Maryland Act. Mather did not,…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Cardillo v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Alaska Packers Assn. v. Industrial Accident Comm'n of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Pacific Employers Insurance v. Industrial Accident Comm'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Bradford Electric Light Co. v. ClapperSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Anderson v. Miller Scrap Iron Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1919
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Stuart v. Colorado Interstate Gas Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- Hauch v. ConnorCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
- Elston v. Industrial Lift Truck Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Wilson v. FaullSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
- Moses-Ecco Company, Inc. v. Roscoe-Ajax Corporation, Roscoe-Ajax Corporation v. Charles DetwilerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1963
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.