Legal Opinion

Pierce v. Banta

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided September 14, 1892No. 516PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Prom the Cass Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtReinhard, C. J.

This action was brought on a bond given on an appeal to the Supreme Court, from a judgment in ejectment. In the court below, the plaintiff recovered judgment for $500.

The facts, as gathered from the record and briefs, are as follows:

In 1873, one Catharine Peters was the owner of three lots of real estate in the city of Logansport, on which she and her husband executed a mortgage to one Crawley, to secure a debt. The taxes for 1873 and 1874 on the lots having become delinquent, they were sold at tax sale to one Uhl, who, in 1877, obtained a deed and went into possession on his tax title. In…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Peters v. BantaIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Harman v. MooreIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Walker v. HellerIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Hartlep v. ColeIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Peters v. GuthrieIndiana Supreme Court · 1889

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ross v. BantaIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Chicago & Southeastern Railway Co. v. GranthamIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Mitchell v. DrakeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. State v. FriendSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931
  5. Small v. KennedyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1895

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API