Legal Opinion · Dissent

Albert Lea Amusement Corp. v. Hanson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 23, 1950No. 35,116Published

1DissentMatson, Justice

I dissent. Unless we expressly overrule State v. Schubert Theatre Players Co. 203 Minn. 366, 281 N. W. 369, plaintiff’s bank-night scheme must be held to be a lottery. There is no difference in substance between the facts here and those of the Schubert case.

In the Schubert case, the purchaser of a theater admission ticket received from the ticket seller a separate coupon bearing a serial or identification number. These coupons were also given free to non-purchasers of tickets who called at the theater and requested them. All coupon holders, whether ticket purchasers or not, participated in…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. City of Wink v. Griffith Amusement Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1936
  2. State v. JonesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Glover v. MalloskaMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
  4. State v. DanzWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Commonwealth v. WallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API