Patchin v. Rowell
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Action of replevin, brought to the Court of Common Pleas in Fairfield County where the issues between the plaintiffs and the defendant Rowell were separately tried by the court, Scott, Jfacts found and judgment rendered for that defendant, and appeal by the plaintiffs. The defendant Rowell subleased two offices, adjoining and connected with his own office, to Lanyon.
Read the full summary
Action of replevin, brought to the Court of Common Pleas in Fairfield County where the issues between the plaintiffs and the defendant Rowell were separately tried by the court, Scott, Jfacts found and judgment rendered for that defendant, and appeal by the plaintiffs. The defendant Rowell subleased two offices, adjoining and connected with his own office, to Lanyon. Rowell owned all of the furniture and fixtures in Lanyon’s offices, except the goods replevied, and used the offices at his convenience. The plaintiffs sold the goods replevied from Rowell, to Lanyon on or about July 25th, 1908,…
1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, J.
The facts found show that the sale of goods by the plaintiffs to Lanyon on July 25th, 1908, was an absolute sale, and that delivery was then made of the goods so sold. The title to these goods, therefore, passed to Lanyon, notwithstanding that they were not then, nor subsequently, paid for.
Lanyon’s sale of these goods about the first of October, 1908, to Rowell, was bona filíe and made upon a valuable consideration, and hence was a good sale between the parties. Meade v. Smith, 16 Conn. 346, 361; Price v. Heubler, 63 Conn. 374, 376, 28 Atl. 524.
The plaintiffs’ claim, that the sale was void…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Meade v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1844
- Morin v. NewburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1906
- Romeo v. MartucciSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1900
- Lynch v. BeecherSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1871
- Capron v. PorterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1876
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Veits v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1948
- Bickart v. SanditzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
- Marciel v. BermanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
- Pacific Wool Growers v. Draper & Co., Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1937
- Coomes v. DrinkwalterNebraska Supreme Court · 1968
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.