Lynch v. Beecher
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Five actions of replevin, brought to the Superior Court in New Haven county, and reserved for advice upon facts found by a committee. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtSeymour, J.
These cases present questions growing out of the purchase by one Kansom Hitchcock of articles of personal property from the several plaintiffs. It appears that the property was sold and delivered to Hitchcock, but he never paid for the same, nor any part thereof, and at the time of the purchase it was his intention and purpose not to pay for it.
The actions are actions of replevin. Four are brought against Beecher, concerning whom the finding is that said Hitchcock after his purchase undertook to vest the title in him, Beecher, he well knowing that the sale and delivery to him . were made by…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- City of New London v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1913
3Cited by12 opinions
- Coleman v. FrancisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
- Wafer v. Harvey County BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1891
- Atlas Assurance Co., Ltd. v. GibbsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
- Kilpatrick-Koch Dry-Goods Co. v. Kahn Bros.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1894
- Patchin v. RowellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1912
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.