Legal Opinion
Wightman v. Consolidated Rail Corp.
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided September 15, 1999No. 1997-2342PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 86 Ohio St.3d 431.] WIGHTMAN ET AL., APPELLANTS AND CROSS-APPELLEES, v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION, APPELLEE AND CROSS-APPELLANT. [Cite as Wightman v. Consolidated Rail Corp.,
1999-Ohio-119.] Torts—Negligence—Damages—Plaintiff who accepts a remittitur may appeal trial court’s determination of damage issue, when—If reviewing court finds no error in determination of damages, plaintiff’s prior acceptance of judgment for reduced amount will be affirmed unless result of principal appeal requires otherwise. A plaintiff who accepts a…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- TXO Production Corp. v. Alliance Resources Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Grannis v. OrdeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Moskovitz v. Mt. Sinai Medical CenterOhio Supreme Court · 1994
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Innovative Technologies Corp. v. Advanced Mgt. Technology, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2011
- Burns v. AdamsOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
- Hager v. Norfolk Western, Unpublished Decision (12-14-2006)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2006
- Cox v. Cox, Ca2008-06-077 (3-30-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
- Dick v. Tab Tool Die Co., 2008-Ca-0013 (10-2-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.