Legal Opinion
Dick v. Tab Tool Die Co., 2008-Ca-0013 (10-2-2008)
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided October 2, 2008No. 2008-CA-0013PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
{¶ 1} Defendant the Tab Tool Die Company, Inc. appeals a judgment of the Court of Common Pleas of Licking County, Ohio, which sustained the motion of plaintiff-appellee Dana Dick for a default judgment and sanctions. Appellant assigns five errors to the trial court:
{¶ 2} "I. THE LOWER COURT ERRED IN GRANTING DEFAULT JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO CIVIL RULE 37 (D) WHICH REQUIRES A NEW TRIAL.
{¶ 3} "II. THE COMPENSATORY DAMAGES AWARD WAS INADVERTENTLY INCREASED IN THE FINAL JUDGMENT ENTRY.
{¶ 4} "III. THE COMPENSATORY DAMAGES AWARD WAS EXCESSIVE.
{¶ 5} "IV. THE LOWER COURT ERRED BY AWARDING PUNITIVE…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Societe Internationale Pour Participations Industrielles Et Commerciales, S. A. v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Moskovitz v. Mt. Sinai Medical CenterOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- Villella v. Waikem Motors, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1989
- Jones v. HartranftOhio Supreme Court · 1997
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Telle v. PasleyOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
- T.P. v. WeissOhio Court of Appeals · 2013