Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Smith v. McCombs

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 8, 1930No. 29,252PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dawson, J.:

The state brings this action to require the mayor and commissioners of Kansas City to comply with the request of the board of public utilities of that municipality to issue and sell $200,000 of bonds to raise funds to defray the cost of constructing a water flume or flow line across the city from its pumping plant on the north to a storage reservoir on the south, which improvement the utility board has decided is requisite to serve the necessities of that part of town.

The board of public utilities was created by authority of chapter 126 of…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Division of Howard CountySupreme Court of Kansas · 1875
  2. State v. BarrettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
  3. Parker-Washington Co. v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
  4. City of Leavenworth v. WilsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  5. Comm'rs of Sedgwick County v. BaileySupreme Court of Kansas · 1874

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Board of Education v. PowersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1935
  2. Kansas Electric Power Co. v. City of EurekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1935
  3. Water District No. 1 v. RobbSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
  4. Drenning v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938
  5. Berentz v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1944

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API