Legal Opinion

Berentz v. Board of Commissioners

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided September 30, 1944No. 36,196PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Parker, J.:

This is an action in mandamus, brought for the purpose of compelling the Board of Commissioners of the city of Coffey-*59ville to pay the plaintiff a pension pursuant to provisions of chapters 119 and 120 of the Laws of 1939 (G. S. 1943 Supp. 13-1492 to 13-1496, inc.), providing for the payment of pensions to water and light employees in certain cities. On issues raised by the pleadings and on agreed statement of facts the trial court granted a peremptory writ of mandamus and rendered a declaratory judgment, from which order and judgment the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Parker-Washington Co. v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
  2. Cole v. DorrSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
  3. Barker v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1939
  4. State ex rel. Smith v. McCombsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1930
  5. Patrick v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Gannon v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
  2. Felten Truck Line, Inc. v. State Board of Tax AppealsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958
  3. Board of County Commissioners v. RobbSupreme Court of Kansas · 1948
  4. Parker v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1963
  5. Harris v. ShanahanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1964

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API