Sherk v. Daisy-Heddon
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
CERCONE, President Judge:
Appellant, Monica Sherk, administratrix of the estate of James Louis Sherk, takes this appeal from the order of the court below, sitting en banc, which denied plaintiff-appellant’s motion for a new trial in a products liability case. Appellant presents three questions for our review: (1) whether it was error for the trial court to exclude evidence of the common knowledge in the community concerning the dangers of the product at issue—a Daisy-Heddon air rifle Model 880, manufactured by the Daisy-Heddon Corporation; (2) whether it was error for the trial court to refuse…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Barker v. Lull Engineering Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
- Webb v. ZernSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Berkebile v. Brantly Helicopter Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Azzarello v. Black Bros. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Cronin v. J.B.E. Olson Corp.California Supreme Court · 1972
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Fleck v. KDI Sylvan Pools, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- Sherk v. DAISY-HEDDON, ETC.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Harford Mutual Insurance v. MoorheadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Ellis v. Chicago Bridge & Iron Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Emerick v. U.S. Suzuki Motor Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.