Legal Opinion

Sherk v. Daisy-Heddon

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 22, 1981No. 12PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CERCONE, President Judge:

Appellant, Monica Sherk, administratrix of the estate of James Louis Sherk, takes this appeal from the order of the court below, sitting en banc, which denied plaintiff-appellant’s motion for a new trial in a products liability case. Appellant presents three questions for our review: (1) whether it was error for the trial court to exclude evidence of the common knowledge in the community concerning the dangers of the product at issue—a Daisy-Heddon air rifle Model 880, manufactured by the Daisy-Heddon Corporation; (2) whether it was error for the trial court to refuse…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Barker v. Lull Engineering Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Webb v. ZernSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  3. Berkebile v. Brantly Helicopter Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Azzarello v. Black Bros. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Cronin v. J.B.E. Olson Corp.California Supreme Court · 1972

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Fleck v. KDI Sylvan Pools, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
  2. Sherk v. DAISY-HEDDON, ETC.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Harford Mutual Insurance v. MoorheadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. Ellis v. Chicago Bridge & Iron Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. Emerick v. U.S. Suzuki Motor Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API