Legal Opinion

Ellis v. Chicago Bridge & Iron Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 1, 1988No. 1715PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CERCONE, Judge:

This appeal is from an order of the trial court denying appellant Chicago Bridge and Iron Company’s (hereinafter “CBI”) post-trial motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and for a new trial.

The relevant facts of the case are as follows: In December, 1979, CBI arranged for the shipment of steel plates, fabricated at its plant in Greenville, Pennsylvania, to the United Arab Emirates by barge via the Port of Philadelphia. The shipment included seventy-two (72) trapezoidal or pie-shaped plates.

CBI packaged the 72 plates of steel in bundles (or drafts) of twelve sheets…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Webb v. ZernSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  2. Berkebile v. Brantly Helicopter Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Azzarello v. Black Bros. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Incollingo v. EwingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  5. Cronin v. J.B.E. Olson Corp.California Supreme Court · 1972

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Fleck v. KDI Sylvan Pools, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
  2. Alvin DILLINGER, Appellant, v. CATERPILLAR, INC., a Delaware Corporation; Wheeler MacHinery Company, Inc., a Utah CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
  3. Harford Mutual Insurance v. MoorheadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. Ettinger v. Triangle-Pacific Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  5. Remy v. Michael D'S Carpet OutletsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API