Harford Mutual Insurance v. Moorhead
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
KELLY, Judge:
In this opinion we are called upon to decide whether under a comprehensive general liability insurance policy, the duty to defend an insured from liability in a civil suit where the insured is sued on the basis of a “negligent failure to warn” is removed by a “Products Hazard” exclu sion. We find that the duty to defend exists in this action, and affirm.
The underlying facts of this appeal were accurately set forth in the trial court opinion as follows:
The Moorheads operate a business known as Presque Isle Wine Cellars in North East, Pennsylvania, one of which business purposes is…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited80 opinions
- Standard Venetian Blind Co. v. American Empire InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Webb v. ZernSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Berkebile v. Brantly Helicopter Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Hutchison v. Sunbeam Coal Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Azzarello v. Black Bros. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- Taurus Holdings v. US FidelitySupreme Court of Florida · 2005
- Bensalem Township v. International Surplus Lines Insurance Company Crum & Forster Managers Corporation, (Ill)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Lucker Manufacturing, a Unit of Amclyde Engineered Products, Inc. v. The Home Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Brazas Sporting Arms, Inc. v. American Empire Surplus Lines InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
- Stidham v. Millvale Sportsmen's ClubSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.