Legal Opinion
Cotton v. PrivateBank and Trust Co.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided November 13, 2002No. 01 C 1099PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
DENLOW, United States Magistrate Judge.
This case is before the court on Private-Bank and Trust’s (“PrivateBank”) motion to compel the production of documents. The issues for decision are (1) whether the Annunzio-Wylie Anti-Money Laundering Act (“Act”) and related regulations prohibit the disclosure of a suspicious activity report (“SAR”), and (2) whether the Act and regulations prohibit the production of the documentation supporting a SAR. For the reasons stated herein, PrivateBank’s motion to compel is denied.
I. BACKGROUND FACTS
A. THE LITIGATION.
The following…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. LarionoffSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Let W. Lee v. Bankers Trust CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- In Re Bankers Trust CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
- Nevin v. Citibank, N.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 2000
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Yorkville Advisors, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Wultz v. Bank of China Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- In re: JPMorgan Chase Bank, NA v.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
- Whitney National Bank v. KaramDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2004
- Union Bank of California, N.A. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.