Legal Opinion

In re: JPMorgan Chase Bank, NA v.

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided August 21, 2015No. 14-8015PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOWARD, Chief Judge.

JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (hereinafter, “Chase”) initiated this mandamus proceeding, asking the court to intervene in what essentially is a discovery dispute. Before the district court, Chase unsuccessfully argued that fifty-five pages of Chase records were shielded from production or use in the underlying putative class action per a provision of the Bank Secrecy Act, 31 U.S.C. § 5318(g) (hereinafter, “the Act”), and related regulations. As explained below, there are significant reasons to doubt that the Act and related regulations apply at all to the unique facts of this…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Mohawk Industries, Inc. v. CarpenterSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  3. Radlax Gateway Hotel, LLC v. Amalgamated BankSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  4. United States v. CalamaroSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. United States v. ChaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1890

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Yershov v. Gannett Satellite Information Network, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2016
  2. Andrew D. Zaron v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court, D. Nevada · 2021
  3. Andrew D. Zaron v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court, D. Nevada · 2021
  4. Camenisch v. Umpqua BankDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2021
  5. Camenisch v. Umpqua BankDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2025

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API