Dixon v. Gladden
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
RODMAN, J. (Pro Tempore).
This is an appeal from a judgment denying post-conviction relief. In 1963 the petitioner upon a plea of guilty to an indictment charging him with rape was sentenced, pursuant to ORS 137.111, to an indeterminate term not to exceed his natural life. He appealed from.the judgment on the ground that the sentence was .cruel and unusual and that the statute providing for a life-sentence for certain sex offenders was unconstitutional. The judgment was affirmed. State v. Dixon, 238 Or 121, 393 P2d 204 (1964), citing Jensen v. Gladden, 231 Or 141, 372 P2d 183 (1962).; In Ms…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Von Moltke v. GilliesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Kercheval v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Schick v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Huffman v. AlexanderOregon Supreme Court · 1952
- In RE WOODS v. RhayWashington Supreme Court · 1966
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Lyons v. PearceOregon Supreme Court · 1985
- Stelts v. State of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 1985
- Jones v. CuppCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
- State v. KingOregon Supreme Court · 2017
- Lay v. CuppCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1969
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.