Lay v. Cupp
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtLangtry, J.
This appeal presents one question — whether a petition under the Post-Conviction Relief Act (ORS 138.510 through 138.680), which relies upon a claimed lack of petitioner’s knowledge of his constitutional rights before plea in a criminal case in which he is represented by counsel, must allege some failure by his counsel of duty to inform him of his rights in order to state a cause for relief.
The petition alleges that petitioner pleaded guilty to burglary not in a dwelling; that prior thereto he “did not know” the maximum penalty therefor; that if he had known it to be 10 years’ imprisonment he…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Von Moltke v. GilliesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Henry v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Huffman v. AlexanderOregon Supreme Court · 1952
- North v. CuppOregon Supreme Court · 1969
- State v. AbelOregon Supreme Court · 1965
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Lerch v. CuppCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
- Jones v. CuppCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
- State v. SlopakCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
- Fletcher v. CuppCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1969
- Wheeler v. CuppCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.