Legal Opinion

Lay v. Cupp

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 12, 1969PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLangtry, J.

This appeal presents one question — whether a petition under the Post-Conviction Relief Act (ORS 138.510 through 138.680), which relies upon a claimed lack of petitioner’s knowledge of his constitutional rights before plea in a criminal case in which he is represented by counsel, must allege some failure by his counsel of duty to inform him of his rights in order to state a cause for relief.

The petition alleges that petitioner pleaded guilty to burglary not in a dwelling; that prior thereto he “did not know” the maximum penalty therefor; that if he had known it to be 10 years’ imprisonment he…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Von Moltke v. GilliesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Henry v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Huffman v. AlexanderOregon Supreme Court · 1952
  4. North v. CuppOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  5. State v. AbelOregon Supreme Court · 1965

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Lerch v. CuppCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
  2. Jones v. CuppCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
  3. State v. SlopakCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
  4. Fletcher v. CuppCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1969
  5. Wheeler v. CuppCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API