Legal Opinion

In RE WOODS v. Rhay

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 12, 1966No. 38323PublishedCited by 73 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHamilton, J.

-This is an original application for a writ of habeas corpus. The gravamen of petitioner’s claim is that his constitutional right to a speedy trial was violated and that his plea of guilty to the crime of forgery in the first degree was involuntary.

It is conceded by counsel for respondent that an inordinate and unexcused delay occurred between petitioner’s arrest and his arraignment. A detailed recitation of the unfortunate circumstances would serve no useful purpose. Suffice it to say that the occurrence was such as to amount to a violation of petitioner’s constitutional rights (Const, art…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. In Re Brandon v. WebbWashington Supreme Court · 1945
  2. State v. StacyWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  3. State v. CiminiWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  4. The People v. De ColaIllinois Supreme Court · 1959
  5. In RE PALMER v. CranorWashington Supreme Court · 1954

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by73 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. State v. SiscoSupreme Court of Iowa · 1969
  3. State v. HolsworthWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  4. State v. PillatosWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  5. State v. PillatosWashington Supreme Court · 2007

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API