Legal Opinion
Spoturno v. Woods
Supreme Court of Delaware
Decided June 15, 1937No. 3PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Layton, C. J.,
delivering the opinion of the court:
We agree with the court below with respect to certain of its conclusions.
Judgment by default having been entered, and the amount due thereon having been ascertained by inquisition at bar, the subsequent death of the defendant did not operate as a dissolution of the attachment.
The amendment of Section 95 of the Corporation Law (Rev. Code 1915, § 2009) accomplished by the first Section of Chapter 105, Volume 33, Delaware Laws (Rev. Code 1935, § 2124), by-including the words, “or any persons’ option to acquire such shares, or his right or…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Grannis v. OrdeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Wuchter v. PizzuttiSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- McDonald v. MabeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Ownbey v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Salt Dome Oil Corp. v. SchenckSupreme Court of Delaware · 1945
- New York Trust Co. v. RileySupreme Court of Delaware · 1940
- Epstein v. Chatham Park, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 1959
- Webb Packing Co. v. HarmonSuperior Court of Delaware · 1937
- Greene v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1953
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.