Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Ajuria

California Supreme Court

Decided May 22, 1922No. Crim. No. 2472PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

The petitioners are imprisoned after conviction upon a charge of violating an ordinance of the city of Marysville declaring it unlawful for any person to have in his possession any intoxicating liquors.

The complaint on which they were convicted is not presented to us and we must therefore presume that it sufficiently charges the offense. We have, heretofore, had similar attacks made upon local ordinances of this character and our decisions therein are against the petitioners on all the points presented in this case with relation to the validity of this ordinance. (See In re…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. MayenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  2. In Re VolpiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  3. In Re PolizzottoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  4. People v. CapelliCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  5. In Re KinneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. AguiarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  2. People v. PeakCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  3. In Re OxmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  4. People v. PeakCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API