St. Louis S. F. R. R. Co. v. Bateman

Opinion by

SHACKELFORD, C.

The defendant in error was the-plaintiff below, and the plaintiff in error was the defendant below'. The parties will be referred to herein as plaintiff and defendant as they appeared in the trial court.

Plaintiff by his action sought to recover damages for personal injury alleged to have been sustained by him while in the employ of the defendant. He alleges, in substance, that on or about the 25th day of June, 1922, and in the nighttime, he was rendering service for the defendant upon its property at Muskogee, in coaling one of the defendant’s engines; that in…