Legal Opinion
Niagara Fire Ins. Co. v. Waters
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided March 27, 1928No. 17232PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TEEI-IEE, O'.
In the court below, where the parties appeared in their reverse order, and will hereinafter be so referred to, the plaintiff, Mary E. Waters, in a suit on a fire insurance policy against the defendant,. Niagara Fire Insurance Company, recovered a judgment of $1,000 for loss covered by the contract of insurance. Upon unsuccessful motion for a new trial and supersession of the judgment by bond, the defendant brought the cause to this court for review.
The matter presented for our consideration is -whether or not the action was prematurely brought. This was raised by demurrer to the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Western & A. Pipe Lines v. Home Ins., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Washington County1891
- Nance v. Oklahoma Fire Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- California Ins. v. GraceySupreme Court of Colorado · 1890
- Connecticut Fire Insurance v. Colorado Leasing, Mining & Milling Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1911
- Western Reciprocal Underwriters' Exchange v. CoonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- American Home Fire Assur. v. HargroveCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1940
- Panther Oil & Gas Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Taylor v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Burt v. RileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929