Legal Opinion

Killey v. St. Louis-S. F. Ry. Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 7, 1926No. 17892PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPhelps, J.

In tbis action the St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Company, a corporation, filed' its action in the district court of Muskogee county, against the defendants, constituting the excise board of Muskogee county, for injunctive relief as provided in State Question No'. 141, Initiative Petition No. 92, adopted by a vote of the people at the regular primary election held on August 3, 1926. To the petition the defendants med their demurrer, which was by the court overruled and defendants refused to plead further and elected' to stand upon their demurrer. The court entered judgment granting the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. LongSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  2. St. Louis S. F. R. R. Co. v. BatemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. C. D. Coggeshall & Co. v. SmileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  2. Protest of Chicago, R, I. & P. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  3. Grubb v. SmileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  4. Jones v. BlaineSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  5. Aaronson v. SmileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API