Legal Opinion
Gould's Case
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided September 12, 1913PublishedCited by 85 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C. J.
This is a proceeding under the workmen’s compensation act, St. 1911, c. 751, and St. 1912, cc. 571 and 666.
1. At the threshold lies a question of practice. The insurer, being a party in interest, presented its petition to the Superior Court, together with certified copies of the decision of the Industrial Accident Board. The petition alleges the interest of the employee, employer and insurer, the date of the decision and the insurer’s desire to have determined questions of law set out in the decision. St. 1911, c. 751, Part III, § 11, as amended by St. 1912, c. 571, §14, provides that “any…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Slater v. Mexican National RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Mulhall v. FallonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
- Stone v. Old Colony Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
- Davis v. New York & New England RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887
- Ewen v. . Thompson-Starrett Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1913
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by85 opinions
- Madden's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
- Bradford Electric Light Co. v. ClapperSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Pigeon's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
- Matter of Post v. . Burger GohlkeNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Lorando v. GethroMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.