Stock Equipment Company, a Unit of General Signal Corporation v. Tennessee Valley Authority
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
TJOFLAT, Chief Judge:
The Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) appeals from a decision of the district court, entered after a bench trial, awarding $2,988,544 to Stock Equipment Co. (Stock) pursuant to a “termination for convenience” clause in a contract between the parties. We affirm. Because the resolution of the parties’ dispute hinges on an understanding of the contractual relationship between TVA and Stock, which itself hinges in part on the extent to which the provisions of a separate contract between TVA and a third party were made applicable to the TVA-Stock contract, we set out the facts…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Kalvar Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
- Petterson Lighterage & T. Corp. v. New York Central R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
- J. S. & H. Construction Company v. Richmond County Hospital AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- Maxima Corporation v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Lowry & Co. v. S.S. Le Moyne D'IbervilleDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1966
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Federal Trade Commission v. On Point Capital Partners LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2021
- Harris Corporation v. Giesting & AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
- RAM Engineering & Construction, Inc. v. University of LouisvilleKentucky Supreme Court · 2003
- Wachovia Bank N.A. v. TienCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014
- David Holbrook v. Tennessee Valley AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2022
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.