Wachovia Bank N.A. v. Tien
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Per curiam
Henry Tien, proceeding pro se, appeals the partial final judgment in an interpleader action, 28 U.S.C. § 1335, in which the district court determined that Tien was not the owner of roughly $1.6 million. On appeal, Tien contends that the district court erred by (1) admitting into evidence the testimony of a forensic accountant and the accountant’s forensic reports, (2) striking Tien’s jury demand, (3) failing to consider all the trial evidence, and (4) denying Tien’s motion for leave to amend his pleading. After careful review, we affirm.
I
We briefly describe the relevant background of this…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Alba v. MontfordCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
- Louise Cook v. Sheriff of Monroe CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
- Goldsmith v. Bagby Elevator Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
- Odessa Dee Hall v. United Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- Burns v. LawtherCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Moore v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Paleteria La Michoacana, Inc. v. Productos Lacteos Tocumbo S.A. De C.V.District Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Perez v. C.R. Calderon Construction, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Todd v. CarstarphenDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2017
- Howard Town Center Developer, LLC v. Howard UniversityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.