Legal Opinion

Stanford University Hospital v. Federal Insurance

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 28, 1999No. Nos. 97-16487 to 97-16489PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KEEP, District Judge:

This case stems from a dispute over coverage under crime insurance policies issued by defendant Federal Insurance Company (“Federal”) to Stanford University Hospital (“Stanford”), Verbatim Corporation (“Verbatim”), and Glendale Adventist Medical Center (“Glendale”) (hereinafter collectively referred to as “plaintiffs”). Plaintiffs entered into payroll tax service agreements with Hamilton-Taft & Co. (“Hamilton-JTaft”) requiring that Hamilton-Taft make timely tax payments on their behalf. Plaintiffs seek indemnification for losses resulting from the misappropriation of…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Bank of the West v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  2. O'Melveny & Myers v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Margolis v. RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  4. Reserve Insurance Co. v. PisciottaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Bay Cities Paving & Grading, Inc. v. Lawyers' Mutual InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. JL Beverage Co. v. Jim Beam Brands Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  2. Eli Lilly & Company, an Indiana Corporation v. Natural Answers, Incorporated, a Florida Corporation, and Brian A. FeinsteinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
  3. 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3031, 1999 Daily Journal D.A.R. 3924 Stanford University Hospital v. Federal Insurance Company, Verbatim Corporation v. Federal Insurance Company, Glendale Adventist Medical Center v. Federal Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  4. GERARDANGE v. TemplerDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API