Legal Opinion
GERARDANGE v. Templer
District Court, N.D. California
Decided February 21, 2006No. C 05-05169 WHAPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER REMANDING CASE AND AWARDING ATTORNEY’S FEES AND VACATING HEARING
ALSUP, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
In this dispute over an Internet domain name, plaintiffs Gerard Angé, G.A.P. International, Inc. (“Gap California”) and World Indigenous Network Corp. move to remand this matter on grounds that this Court lacks removal jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1441(b). Plaintiffs also move for attorney’s fees under 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c). Finding that no federal question was presented in plaintiffs’ complaint, this order Grants plaintiffs’ motion to remand and Grants plaintiffs’ request for attorney’s…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Frank D. Gaus v. Miles, Inc., an Indiana CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Grable & Sons Metal Products, Inc. v. Darue Engineering & ManufacturingSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Emrich v. Touche Ross & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Balcorta v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Bosley Medical Institute, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, and Bosley Medical Group, S.C., an Illinois Corporation v. Michael Steven KremerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hafer v. District AttorneyDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022