Prudential Co. v. City of Minneapolis
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Holt, Justice.
The city of Minneapolis appeals from the judgment entered in favor of plaintiff. The main assignments of error are that the conclusions of law are not sustained by the findings of fact, and it is thought that a decision may be reached without considering whether or not certain challenged findings of fact are supported by the evidence. The facts not open to dispute are: Defendant owns and operates waterworks supplying water at established rates to private consumers in the city. In the city, at numbers 300 to 310 East Fifteenth street, are large apartment buildings, using the city…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Dimond v. ManheimSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
- Turner v. Revere Water Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898
- Girard Life Insurance v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1879
- City of Atlanta v. BurtonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1892
- City of East Grand Forks v. LuckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- City of Maryville v. CushmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1952
- Freeman v. HayekDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1986
- Cascade Motor Hotel, Inc. v. City of DuluthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Cohn v. CelebrezzeCuyahoga County Common Pleas Court · 1958