Legal Opinion

City of Maryville v. Cushman

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided May 27, 1952No. 43138PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConkling, J.

This is a proceeding filed by the respondent

City of Maryville, Missouri, under Sections 108.310 to 108.350 ESMo. 1949, for a pro forma decree authorizing the issuance and declaring the validity of $450,000 principal amount of Combined Waterworks and Sewerage System Eevenue Bonds of that city. Intervenors (hereinafter called apxoellants) who are taxpayers, water users and sewer users in Maryville, were permitted to file their intervening petition praying the bonds be held invalid. The decree of the circuit court declared the bonds valid and intervenors then appealed.

This is the first case in…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Louisville & Jefferson County Metropolitan Sewer Dist. v. Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1948
  2. Carson v. Brockton Sewerage CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  3. State Ex Rel. Randolph County v. WaldenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1947
  4. Sharp v. HallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
  5. State Ex Rel. City of Hannibal v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1934

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Contractors & Builders Ass'n v. City of DunedinSupreme Court of Florida · 1976
  2. Cape Motor Lodge, Inc. v. City of Cape GirardeauSupreme Court of Missouri · 1986
  3. Petition of Board of Public BuildingsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1962
  4. StopAquila. Org v. City of PeculiarSupreme Court of Missouri · 2006
  5. Three Rivers Junior College District of Poplar Bluff v. StatlerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API