Legal Opinion
Freeman v. Hayek
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided April 30, 1986No. Civ. 4-85-694PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DIANA E. MURPHY, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Deborah Freeman and Barb Bissonnette have brought this class action against Jimmie Hayek, individually and in his capacity as Director of the Minneapolis Water Works, Otis Smith, individually and in his capacity as Supervisor of Administrative Services of the Minneapolis Water Works, and the City of Minneapolis, a municipal corporation. They allege that defendants’ policies and procedures for termination of water and sewer service violate the due process and equal protection clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment and 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiffs seek…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Memphis Light, Gas & Water Division v. CraftSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States Department of Agriculture v. MorenoSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Marceline M. DONALDSON and Others Similarly Situated, Appellant, v. the PILLSBURY COMPANY Et Al., AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Tucker v. Hinds CountyMississippi Supreme Court · 1990
- Wayt v. Town of CrothersvilleDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2012
- Smith v. City of OwatonnaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Melvin R. Kurr v. Village of Buffalo GroveCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- Smith v. City of OwatonnaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.