Legal Opinion

Herrick v. Sargent

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided September 29, 1908PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Clay District Gourt. — Hon. A. D. Bailie, Judge. Action in equity to quiet title to a tract of land. Decree for plaintiffs, and defendants appeal. —

1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.

— The pleadings in this case are voluminous, if not confusing. The abstract of appellants set forth a “Petition,” an “Amended and Substituted Petition,” an “Amendment to the Substituted Petition,” “Answer, Cross-Petition, Cross-Bill and Counterclaim,” “Answer to Cross-Petition,” “Reply to Cross-Petition,” “Answer to Cross-Petition and Counterclaim,” “Answer to Cross-Petition and Cross-Bill and Counterclaim,” “Reply to the Answer and Cross-Petition of the Plaintiff,” closing with a document entitled “Amendment to Answer to the Defendants’ Cross-Petition and Counterclaim and as Amendment to the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Wisconsin Central Railroad v. Price CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Witherspoon v. DuncanSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  3. Carroll v. SaffordSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
  4. Maish v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  5. Northern Pacific Railroad Company v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1894

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cheney v. Minidoka CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 1914
  2. King County v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1922
  3. L. E. White Lumber Co. v. County of MendocinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Haumesser v. Chehalis CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Bishop v. County of O'BrienSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API