Legal Opinion
L. E. White Lumber Co. v. County of Mendocino
California Supreme Court
Decided March 12, 1918No. S. F. No. 7875PublishedCited by 4 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.
Judgment was given against plaintiff after the court had sustained the demurrer to its second amended complaint without leave to amend.
The suit was one for the return of taxes paid during a number of years by plaintiff to the proper authorities of the county of Mendocino. By the plaintiff’s pleading it appears that F. A. Hyde and F. A. Hyde So Company, prior to May 8, 1903, selected certain enumerated lands in Mendocino County with forest lieu base under the act of Congress of June 3, 1897, and proper certificates for the lands so selected were issued by the government of the United States;…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Witherspoon v. DuncanSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Cosmos Exploration Co. v. Gray Eagle Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Hussman v. DurhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- State v. MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
- Northern Pacific Railroad Company v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kaiser Co. v. ReidCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- McCaslin v. DeCampCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Rand Corp. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Mitsui Fudosan (U.S.A.), Inc. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990