Maish v. Arizona
Supreme Court of the United States
APPEAL PROM THE SUPREME COURT OP THE TERRITORY OP ARIZONA. This was a suit in the District Court of the First Judicial District of the Territory of Arizona, sitting in and for the county of Pima, to recover delinquent taxes. Several parties were included as defendants. A decree was rendered May 7, 1892, establishing the taxes and foreclosing the tax liens.
Read the full summary
APPEAL PROM THE SUPREME COURT OP THE TERRITORY OP ARIZONA. This was a suit in the District Court of the First Judicial District of the Territory of Arizona, sitting in and for the county of Pima, to recover delinquent taxes. Several parties were included as defendants. A decree was rendered May 7, 1892, establishing the taxes and foreclosing the tax liens. The appellants, after a motion for a new trial, carried the case to the Supreme Court of the Territory, by which, on January 17, 1894, the decree was affirmed, 37 Pac. Rep. 370, and thereupon an appeal was taken to this court. These…
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brewer
The statute, as will be seen, authorizes any one interested in any of the property to defend against the taxes sought to be charged thereon, “specifying in writing the particular cause of objection,” and requires the court, when such'defence is made, to “hear and determine the matter in a summary manner, without pleadings,” and to “pronounce judgment, as the right of the case may be.” The statute also provides that the delinquent tax list is prima facie evidence that the “ taxes therein are due against the property.”
The appellants filed ten objections to the taxes charged against their…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. BackusSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Railway Co. v. PrescottSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Railway Co. v. McShaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Botiller v. DominguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Catholic Bishop of Nesqually v. GibbonSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- Sunday Lake Iron Co. v. Township of WakefieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Baltimore Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co. v. BaltimoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Baker v. DruesedowSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Missouri v. DockerySupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Camp Phosphate Co. v. AllenSupreme Court of Florida · 1919
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.