Legal Opinion

Haumesser v. Chehalis County

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1913No. 11422PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Chehalis county, Irwin, J., entered May 21, 1913, in favor of the plaintiff, upon an agreed statement of facts, in an action to restrain the collection of taxes.

1Opinion of the CourtMount, J.

This action was brought by the plaintiff to restrain Chehalis county from collecting taxes for the years 1911 and 1912 upon certain lands owned by him, upon the ground that the taxes levied for those years were void.

The cause was tried upon an agreed statement of facts. The court concluded, as a matter of law, that the taxes for 1911 and 1912 levied upon the plaintiff’s lands were void. A judgment was accordingly entered. The defendant, Chehalis county, has appealed.

The stipulated facts are as follows-: On June 24, 1905,-Joseph Haumesser made homestead application for the lands . in question.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Johnson v. TowsleySupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  2. Wisconsin Central Railroad v. Price CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Witherspoon v. DuncanSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  4. Carroll v. SaffordSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
  5. Cornelius v. KesselSupreme Court of the United States · 1888

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Flood v. VirnigWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Wildy v. HenryWashington Supreme Court · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API