Legal Opinion

Pen & Ink, LLC v. Alpine City

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided July 22, 2010No. 20090430-CAPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION

VOROS, Judge:

1 1 Plaintiffs David Lynton and Pen & Ink, LLC, (collectively, Lynton) petitioned Alpine City (Alpine) for approval of Lynton's residential building plans. The Alpine Planning Commission and the Alpine City Council both denied the request. Lynton sought judicial review. The parties filed eross-motions for summary judgment; the district court granted Alpine's motion and denied Lynton's. Lynton appeals. We affirm.

BACKGROUND

12 In 1995, several property owners in Utah County sought to annex their subdivision to Alpine. To this end, they signed an Annexation…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cabaness v. ThomasUtah Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Fox v. Park CityUtah Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Pacific West Communities, Inc. v. Grantsville CityCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2009
  4. M & S COX INVESTMENTS v. Provo City Corp.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2007
  5. Caster v. West Valley CityCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2001

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Checketts v. Providence CityCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2018
  2. Fuller v. Springville CityCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2015
  3. Macfarlane v. CSROCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2019
  4. Daines v. LOGAN CITYCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2012
  5. Daines v. Logan CityCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API