Legal Opinion

M & S COX INVESTMENTS v. Provo City Corp.

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided September 27, 2007No. 20060386-CAPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BILLINGS, Judge:

T1 Plaintiffs M & S Cox Investments, LLC, and Mervyn and Sue Cox (collectively, Cox) appeal two trial court orders. | First, Cox appeals the trial court's grant of summary judgment to Defendant Provo City Corporation (the City). Second, Cox appeals the trial court's intervention order. We affirm. >

BACKGROUND

T2 In 1996, Cox acquired residential property (the Property) in Provo, Utah, for $192,624. At the time of Cox's purchase, the Property was zoned as R1i-Single Family Residential with an "S" Supplementary Residential Overlay. The S-Overlay zoning provision permitted…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Alcoa v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Carrier v. Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Biddle v. Washington Terrace CityUtah Supreme Court · 1999
  4. In Re Marriage of GonzalezUtah Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Norman v. ArnoldUtah Supreme Court · 2002

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Pacific West Communities, Inc. v. Grantsville CityCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2009
  2. Pen & Ink, LLC v. Alpine CityCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2010
  3. Cahoon v. HINCKLEY TOWN APPEAL AUTHORITYCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2012
  4. Fuja v. Woodland HillsCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2022
  5. Cahoon v. Hinckley TownCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API