Legal Opinion

Checketts v. Providence City

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided March 22, 2018No. 20160570-CAPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORME, Judge:

¶1 After Providence City (the City) notified Chris and Sandra Checketts of its determination that their home business violated several local ordinances, the Checkettses brought the matter before the Providence City Appeal Authority (the Appeal Authority).

*74 The Appeal Authority solicited comments from the public and permitted the parties to present evidence and argument at a hearing, and in the end, it concluded that the City's decision was not arbitrary, capricious, or illegal. The Checkettses sought review of the Appeal Authority's decision in the district court, with even less…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Bagley v. BagleyUtah Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Springville Citizens for a Better Community v. City of SpringvilleUtah Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Salt Lake City Corp. v. Big Ditch Irrigation Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Utah County v. BaxterUtah Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Fox v. Park CityUtah Supreme Court · 2008

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Staker v. Town of SpringdaleCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2020
  2. Behar v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2024
  3. Scott Anderson Trucking v. Nielson ConstructionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2020
  4. Bermes v. Summit CountyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2023
  5. American Rocky Mountaineer v. Grand County State of UtahDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2021

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API