Legal Opinion

York Ins. Group of Maine v. Van Hall

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided December 12, 1997Published

1Opinion of the Court

704 A.2d 366 (1997)

1997 ME 230

YORK INSURANCE GROUP OF MAINE

v.

Carol VAN HALL.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine.

Argued September 3, 1997.

Decided December 12, 1997.

Noah D. Wuesthoff (orally), Monaghan, Leahy, Hochadel & Libby, Portland, for plaintiff.

Joseph L. Ferris (orally), Ferris, Dearborn & Willey, Brewer, for defendant.

Paul F. Macri, Berman & Simmons, P.A., Lewiston, for amici curiae Mary Tremblay.

Laurence H. Leavitt, Freidman, Babcock & Gaythwaite, Portland, for amici curiae Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co.

Before WATHEN, C.J., and ROBERTS, CLIFFORD, RUDMAN, DANA, and LIPEZ, JJ.

DANA, Justice.

[¶…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Ouellette v. Maine Bonding & Casualty Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1985
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. GelineWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Amica Mutual Insurance v. MaloneyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Kandlis v. HuotariSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
  5. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. ClintonOregon Supreme Court · 1974

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API