Legal Opinion

State v. Wiley

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 22, 1994No. 61024-0PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGuy, J.

Respondent Robert Hunt contends the trial court miscalculated his offender score under the Sentencing Reform Act of 1981 (SRA).'At issue is whether the trial court must determine if three pre-1975 convictions for grand larceny, felonies at the time, constitute felonies or misdemeanors under the current theft statute. Hunt argues the three convictions would be misdemeanors today because of the dollar value of the stolen property at the time of the convictions and therefore should not count toward his offender score. The Court of Appeals agreed and remanded for resentencing. We reverse and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. DunawayWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Allingham v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Addleman v. Board of Prison Terms and ParolesWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  4. State Ex Rel. Grandstaff v. GoreTennessee Supreme Court · 1945
  5. State v. WeiandCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. State v. FordWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State v. MorleyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State v. RossWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  4. State v. RossWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  5. State v. CruzWashington Supreme Court · 1999

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API