State v. Ross
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBridge, J.
These defendants principally assert that the State’s failure to prove at sentencing that their prior out-of-state and/or federal convictions were comparable to Washington State felony crimes, and thus properly included in their offender scores, constitutes legal error. They contend that pursuant to our decision in In re Personal Restraint of Goodwin, 146 Wn.2d 861, 50 P.3d 618 (2002), they cannot waive a challenge to a sentence based on a miscalculated offender score. Division One and Division Two of the Court of Appeals denied their appeals holding that the sentencing courts properly…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- United States v. BatchelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- In Re EstradaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- State v. GentryWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. AmmonsWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. FordWashington Supreme Court · 1999
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by103 opinions
- State v. GraysonWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. FosterCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
- State v. FosterCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
- State v. MendozaWashington Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. MendozaWashington Supreme Court · 2009
98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.