Legal Opinion

State v. Ham

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 22, 1944PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtScheNck, J.

Tbe first exceptive assignments of error set out in tbe appellants’ brief are those numbered one and two and are to tbe court’s refusal to allow tbe defendants’ motion to dismiss tbe action or for judgment of nonsuit lodged when tbe State bad produced its evidence and rested its case and renewed after- all tbe evidence in tbe case was • concluded (G. S., 15-173). We are constrained to sustain these assignments in so far as they relate to tbe defendant Raymond Hardy, since tbe evidence raises no more than a suspicion of bis guilt. Tbe assignments in so far as they relate to William Davis…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Mattox v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. State v. . PayneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  3. State v. . McKinnonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  4. State v. . SmoakSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  5. State v. . HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. HamiltonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  2. State v. ArnoldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  3. State v. MurraySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  4. State v. BooneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  5. State v. DawsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API