Legal Opinion
Clark v. Taylor
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided October 15, 1947No. 257, Docket 20580PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CLARK, Circuit Judge.
At the outset we must determine the finality, and hence the appealability, of an order holding that a receiver acting for the asserted owner of a chose in action, in dispute among the various parties to the action, has no title thereto. The chose in action here involved is a sum of money allegedly owed as royalties by the American' Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers to a similar Austrian organization, AKM,1 under a contract between the two. On June 12, 1941, defendant-appellant Propper was appointed temporary receiver of the assets of AKM located in the State of…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Catlin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Collins v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Reeves v. BeardallSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Hohorst v. Hamburg-American Packet Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Collins v. Metro-Goldwyn Pictures CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Dickinson v. Petroleum Conversion Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Dery v. WyerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
- Revere Copper and Brass Incorporated v. The Aetna Casualty and Surety Company, and Third-Party v. George A. Fuller Company, Inc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
- Republic of China v. American Express Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
- Smith v. JenkinsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.