Legal Opinion

Mayland L. Clark v. Albert Gulesian

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided July 15, 1970No. 7581PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALDRICH, Chief Judge.

This is a diversity action for malpractice. In 1952, when the plaintiff was ten years old, he was given emergency surgical treatment by the defendant physician. Allegedly his health was poor thereafter, and in 1969 he underwent further surgery. Allegedly at this time a towel was discovered in his abdomen which had been left there during the original operation and which had continuously interfered with his digestive system, and consequently caused his poor health. Defendant pleaded the Maine statute of limitations. Concededly this statute applies, and, concededly, under…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Flanagan v. Mount Eden General HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
  2. Paul Eugene Tessier v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1959
  3. Tantish v. SzendeySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1962

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Roynell Joshua v. The United States, on MotionCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
  2. Ciccarelli v. Carey Canadian Mines, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
  3. William R. Jewson v. Mayo ClinicCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
  4. Austin v. LitvakSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  5. Myrick v. JamesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API