Legal Opinion

American Exchange National Bank v. Lacy

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 21, 1924PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.

In 1920, J. M. "Waynick was engaged in selling automobiles, and on 31 December executed and delivered to the plaintiff the written instrument described in the judgment as a bill of sale. There is no pretension that he paid the license tax prescribed by law, and it is found as a fact that the plaintiff paid no such tax during either of the fiscal years set out in the record. In 1921 or 1922 Waynick abandoned his business, and the plaintiff took possession of and sold all the automobiles, and now has the truck, which he has repeatedly offered for sale. The only question for decision is whether…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Field v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Connolly v. Union Sewer Pipe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
  3. United States v. SteffensSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  4. The Employers'liability CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  5. Presser v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1886

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. WaddellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  2. Jackson v. Guilford County Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  3. Hobbs v. County of MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  4. State v. FredellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  5. Starbuck v. Town of HavelockSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API