Legal Opinion

Carpinelli v. Reading Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 3, 1931No. Appeals, 316 and 317PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Maxey,

The question in this ease is, Was there sufficient evidence to support the jury’s finding that the act which resulted in injuries to the minor plaintiff was committed by defendant’s servant? The claim was that the fifteen year old plaintiff, Henry Carpinelli, while “stealing a ride” on a freight car of the defendant when the car was in motion, was ejected with such force by the defendant’s servant that he sustained injuries which resulted in the loss of his leg. The defendant denied that any of its servants committed the act complained of. The minor plaintiff…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mars v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  2. Horen v. DavisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  3. Folger v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Jann v. Linton's LunchSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  2. Gottlieb v. SchafferDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1956
  3. Misorski v. Pennsylvania R.R. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  4. Sebastianelli Et Vir. v. C. Simpson Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API