Legal Opinion

Haynie v. Hogue Lumber & Supply Co. of Gulfport, Inc.

District Court, S.D. Mississippi

Decided March 26, 1951No. Civ. A. No. 1067PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WATSON, District Judge.

This is an action by Plaintiff-employee against Defendant-employer for overtime compensation, liquidated damages and counsel fees under the provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S.C.A. § 201 et seq. This action was tried by the Court without a jury. After the Plaintiff completed the presentation of his evidence, the Defendant moved for a dismissal.

Defendant, a Mississippi Corporation, operated a lumber and building materials yard in Gulfport, Mississippi. Plaintiff was employed by Defendant as a night watchman at its lumber yard for a period of 73…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Walling v. Consumers Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1945
  2. Fleming v. American Stores Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1941
  3. Zehring v. Brown Materials, Ltd.District Court, S.D. California · 1943
  4. Carrigan v. Provident Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1946

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. AMP Inc. v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  2. Paper Products Co. v. PittsburghSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  3. Mitchell v. T. F. Taylor Fertilizer Works, Inc.District Court, M.D. Georgia · 1955
  4. Gellman v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1955
  5. Mitchell v. Furman Beauty Supply, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1961

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API