Legal Opinion
Mitchell v. T. F. Taylor Fertilizer Works, Inc.
District Court, M.D. Georgia
Decided July 7, 1955No. Civ. A. No. 359PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOOTLE, District Judge.
The Secretary of Labor seeks an injunction against T. F. Taylor Fertilizer Works, Inc., for alleged violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 201 et seq. At a pre-trial conference it was settled that the only issues are:(a) Whether defendant’s sales are recognized as retail sales in the particular industry.(b) Whether defendant’s office and plant constitute one establishment, or two separate establishments.(c) Whether defendant’s office and plant each qualifies as an exempt retail establishment within the meaning of Title 29, U.S.C.A. § 213(a) (2) and is…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Cream of Wheat Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1915
- Super-Cold Southwest Co. v. McBrideCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941
- White Motor Co. v. LittletonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941
- Walling v. Consumers Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1945
- Walling v. Goldblatt Bros.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1945
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Arthur J. Goldberg, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Harry Sorvas, Individually and Doing Business as Merit Protective ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1961
- Mitchell v. KroutDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1957
- Mitchell v. SorvasDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1960