Paper Products Co. v. Pittsburgh
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Woodside, J.,
The question before us in this appeal from the County Court of Allegheny County is whether the appellant made certain sales as a “wholesale dealer or vendor,” or whether it made them as a “retail dealer or vendor,” as those terms are used in the Mercantile License Tax Act of June 20, 1947, P. B. 745, Section 1, 24 PS §582.1 et seq. and Ordinance No. 488 of the City of Pittsburgh, enacted under authority of the Act of June 25, 1947, P. B. 1145 (53 PS §§2015.1-2015-8).
The court below adopted the contention of the city and school district that the taxpayer made the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Kroger Grocery & Baking Co. v. GranderOhio Supreme Court · 1948
- Rieck-McJunkin Dairy Co. v. Pittsburgh School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
- Pittsburgh Milk Co. v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
- Brown & Zortman Machinery Co. v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
- Wiseman v. Arkansas Wholesale Grocers' Ass'nSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1936
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- AMP Inc. v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Quest Diagnostics, Inc. v. Director, Division of TaxationNew Jersey Tax Court · 2004
- AMP Inc. v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- In re Twisteroo Soft Pretzel Bakeries, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
- MacKe Co. v. Comptroller of TreasuryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.